Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death

Subject: Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death
From: egglesto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Brian Eggleston)
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 1994 23:39:18 -0600

Brad:

In what sense did Hayek & von Mises represent a "Copernican revolution"?
I don't understand the allusion.

Brian Eggleston
DEpartment of Economics
Augustana College
egglesto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death
Next by Date: More equilibrium, stasis and death
Previous by thread: Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death
Next by thread: Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death, (continued)
  - Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death, Brian Eggleston Wed 19 Jan 1994, 19:04 GMT
  - Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death, FAC_BROSSER Wed 19 Jan 1994, 19:28 GMT
  - Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death, FAC_BROSSER Wed 19 Jan 1994, 19:54 GMT
  - Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death, Steve . Keen Wed 19 Jan 1994, 21:58 GMT
  - Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death, Brian Eggleston Thu 20 Jan 1994, 05:39 GMT
  - Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death, Paul Davidson Thu 20 Jan 1994, 13:11 GMT
  - Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death, Steve . Keen Thu 20 Jan 1994, 22:29 GMT
  - Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death, ECOPPC Fri 21 Jan 1994, 18:28 GMT
- Colander and NK (by now, equilibrium versus ?), UNICOLL Tue 18 Jan 1994, 17:19 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]