PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death
- Subject: Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death
- From: egglesto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Brian Eggleston)
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 1994 13:04:30 -0600
Paul Christensen noted that "what we need is a total systems approach..."
Clarification, please. Is the reference to offshoots of Bertalanffy's
systems (note the plural) theory or to variants on Zadeh's system theory
(or neither of these)? The latter has greater affinity for complexity/
chaos than does the former which I have always seen as too "mechanistic".
There was always too much "logical positivism" in systems theory, IMHO.
Brian Eggleston
Department of Economics
Augustana College
egglesto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- equilibrium and corpses,
UNICOLL Tue 18 Jan 1994, 19:02 GMT
- Equilibrium, stasis and death,
Brad Cox @ GMU/PSOL Tue 18 Jan 1994, 17:58 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death,
Brian Eggleston Tue 18 Jan 1994, 20:23 GMT
- Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death,
ECOPPC Wed 19 Jan 1994, 18:36 GMT
- Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death,
Brian Eggleston Wed 19 Jan 1994, 19:04 GMT
- Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death,
FAC_BROSSER Wed 19 Jan 1994, 19:28 GMT
- Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death,
FAC_BROSSER Wed 19 Jan 1994, 19:54 GMT
- Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death,
Steve . Keen Wed 19 Jan 1994, 21:58 GMT
- Re: Equilibrium, stasis and death,
Brian Eggleston Thu 20 Jan 1994, 05:39 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]