PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics
Response to Keen:
The term "extrinsic" in the sunspot literature is not the
same as the term "exogenous." It means that they are factors not
based on technology or preferences for final goods demands that
are the traditional underpinnings of the Arrow-Debreu general
equlibrium. They may well evolve "endogenously" in response
to market/historical processes in a manner distinct from technology
and specific demands. I think this is exactly in the spirit of
Minsky and also the Keynes "beauty contest" model. I note that
all of these literatures were/are very concerned with the
phenomenon of speculative bubbles. I also note that the Grandmont
model is strictly endogenous, if allowing for "extrinsic" elements
as defined above. I am not aware that New Keynesian models of the
coordination failure type assert, assume, or presume stable
equilibria. Some are, some are not.
Have multiple good days!
Barkley Rosser,
JMU
- Thread context:
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics, (continued)
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
Jim Devine Wed 12 Jan 1994, 18:11 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
Steve . Keen Wed 12 Jan 1994, 22:19 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
Paul Davidson Thu 13 Jan 1994, 11:17 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
Paul Davidson Thu 13 Jan 1994, 11:34 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
FAC_BROSSER Thu 13 Jan 1994, 17:37 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
FAC_BROSSER Thu 13 Jan 1994, 22:08 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
Steve . Keen Fri 14 Jan 1994, 00:12 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
FAC_BROSSER Fri 14 Jan 1994, 16:13 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
Steve . Keen Sun 16 Jan 1994, 03:50 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]