Re: [Pen-l] A velvet revolution in Iran?

[ravi <ravi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jun 28, 2009, at 12:27 AM, ravi wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2009, at 12:02 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
> > On Jun 27, 2009, at 11:27 PM, ravi wrote:
> >
> > > Over on lbo-talk, dismissing an argument using the term "anti- 
> > > imperialist" in an ill-reasoned pejorative way has come to pass  
> > > for serious debate (a luxury of those who have lived on the right  
> > > side of imperialism, I guess)
> >
> > Bullshit. Could you provide a quote or two to back up this  
> > preposterous assertion?
>
> Ping me tomorrow if I forget (I just set myself a reminder as well).  
> If you wish to search the archives: I think Shane had some fancy  
> bits about shibboleths and so on.


Here's that one:

http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/pipermail/lbo-talk/Week-of-Mon-20090622/009211.html

Here's another one:

http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/pipermail/lbo-talk/Week-of-Mon-20090615/008815.html

The debate on LBO is primarily between Michael Smith and Ken Hanley on  
one side and a bunch of others on the other. However, the arguments  
offered and questions raised by both Michael and Ken are not based on  
an assumption of U.S imperialism.

	--ravi


> Me, I am sensitive to people dissing anti-imperialism in any manner.  
> Hence the paranthetical comment.

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l