PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: [Pen-l] the "general strike" in Iran and the U.S.



On 6/22/09, Bill O'Connor said:

> Robert Naiman . . . writes:
>
>>  *   *   *
>>  wouldn't a "general strike" be illegal in the U.S.
>> under Taft-Hartley?
>
>  Absolutely illegal in the U.S.

Apart from this being, at best, a theoretical metalegal" but not real-life legal question and from the related fantastical factual premise of the above ruminations (i.e., that it is not culturally/politically unrealistic even in light of presently ongoing circumstances to posit anything close to a general strike in the U.S.), what provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act (whether as originally enacted or as since amended) or, for that matter, anywhere else in U.S. law make a "general strike" as that term is commonly understood "absolutely illegal in the U.S."?


_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]