PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] smart grid question
- To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] smart grid question
- From: raghu <mraghu01@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:42:47 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dPo0SaVTOmGsp2KLSf80NuJqDpNPiI0a1JmohL9U+14=; b=QABBsQ+pCTKy9HJJM43ralAt+o8/WCvF8PDp1q/YMl9iL87QN5QxHE5OXHBiHNWm6y DwHlukvVkeshGFJLLDRwMSKBrvwSn0LieYRD4/5Axp9HqmcrApIxMdB5YEJa/4CniKHs UWqyoKnoI0yXNRe2YRFkxzXcoZK5JNRXn59Y0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XzgEeCaK6S/pcP/xrUdEdWlUEZ4euuJm/DaGfN20ahxcrUffLYHsRYrTtE7VPq2Ijb Z7d/j8lJ4QBKrcbQaDMPFHnWEavERIOMJkBBbgCP/rrF2jckTDJ/lxOyV8TGNMgnAQSc JWMAhtK9JPKsgIDKxiqgd/G8geLh56uUx3gBI=
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Gar Lipow<gar.lipow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The initial discussion was whether a smart grid would facilitate
> Enron-like pricing and soon turned into a discussion of "is a smart
> grid all bad". Apparently the discussion only became fetishism when
> the answer to that question was "no". Take a radical decrease in
> production as goal. I think that is fetishism too, but assume for the
> sake of discussion that a production decrease is needed. Do you really
> think HOW we reduce production does not matter?. Do you really
> believe that the right way to decrease production is to do the same
> thing we do now, only decrease quantities? If not why are you so
> friggin eager to derail any discussion of what the right thing to do
> is?
To be fair, I don't think Carrol was trying to derail the discussion
on how to distribute electricity. He was trying to *add* to the
discussion the essential point that efficiency ain't going to cut it.
Reduced energy consumption is essential. A point that I wholeheartedly
agree with.
-raghu.
--
"It's not the principle of the thing, it's the money!"
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] smart grid question, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] smart grid question,
Gar Lipow Tue 09 Jun 2009, 20:45 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] smart grid question,
Doyle Saylor Tue 09 Jun 2009, 21:24 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] smart grid question,
Gar Lipow Wed 10 Jun 2009, 01:44 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] smart grid question,
Doyle Saylor Wed 10 Jun 2009, 01:56 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] smart grid question,
raghu Wed 10 Jun 2009, 03:09 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] smart grid question,
Doyle Saylor Wed 10 Jun 2009, 04:00 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] smart grid question,
Eugene Coyle Thu 11 Jun 2009, 01:11 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] smart grid question,
Gar Lipow Thu 11 Jun 2009, 02:26 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]