PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Pen-l] The Fragility of Economic Data
Measurement of profits always includes a certain degree of subjectivity
as long as the operation involves durable physical assets or longer-term
financial assets, the value of which will depend upon future economic
conditions. The economist who concerns himself most deeply with this
issue was J. R. Hicks, a younger contemporary of Keynes. Hicks
recognized that accounting is backward looking, while economic values
depend upon the unknowable future. I backward looking, Hicks meant that
accountants use previous prices and extrapolations based upon historical
experience. Economics looks at an investment in terms of how it is
expected to perform in the future.
For example, when a business purchases a computer for $10,000, it does
not write off the full cost in the year of purchase. Instead, it will
follow an accounting convention, which will subtract a fixed amount of
depreciation for each year of its expected life. Nobody knows whether
the computer will be obsolete in two years instead of the expected five.
If it has to be replaced sooner than expected, then the computer will
have to be depreciated prematurely.
The degree of uncertainty becomes far greater with financial
instruments. For this reason, accounting rules can become a matter of
life and death for a corporation. To make matters worse, accounting
tricks permit corporations to create an illusion of success. Such
practices do not depend upon Enron-like fraud. Instead, skilled
accountants can circumvent the law, making financial regulation into an
oxymoron. At the same time, investors presumed to be making informed
decisions, even though they have no way of penetrating the opacity of
accounting that supposed to measure how well a firm is doing.
The FASB is supposed to be there to provide investors with reliable
information, but when this information became inconvenient, Congress
stepped in. Congress did not have to pass any laws; it merely had to
threaten to do so.
So now the banks are healthy. The stock market is improving. When will
the other shoe drop?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929
530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- [Pen-l] blog entry: music, music, music, or how amy winehouse made me cry,
MICHAEL YATES Mon 08 Jun 2009, 13:10 GMT
- [Pen-l] Europe,
McDonough, Terrence Mon 08 Jun 2009, 10:17 GMT
- [Pen-l] The Academics,
McDonough, Terrence Mon 08 Jun 2009, 09:31 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] European vs. U.S. Unemployment Explained,
soula avramidis Mon 08 Jun 2009, 06:32 GMT
- [Pen-l] The Fragility of Economic Data,
michael perelman Mon 08 Jun 2009, 03:05 GMT
- [Pen-l] Coercing Regulators to Create Fictitious Profits,
michael perelman Mon 08 Jun 2009, 02:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]