Re: It's the metonymy, stupid! (was Re: [Pen-l] Re: De-Growth Conference Declaration)

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: It's the metonymy, stupid! (was Re: [Pen-l] Re: De-Growth Conference Declaration)
From: Laurent GUERBY <laurent@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 11:45:10 +0200

BTW, did someone study the pertinence of growth (as currently measured)
minus bank credit increase (outstanding monetary creation increase) as
an indicator ? After all bank credit increase is a bet on future growth
and not this year growth, and bank credit is temporary.

Thoughts?

Laurent



_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

References:
- It's the metonymy, stupid! (was Re: [Pen-l] Re: De-Growth Conference Declaration)
  - From: Sandwichman
- Re: It's the metonymy, stupid! (was Re: [Pen-l] Re: De-Growth Conference Declaration)
  - From: Jim Devine
- Re: It's the metonymy, stupid! (was Re: [Pen-l] Re: De-Growth Conference Declaration)
  - From: Sandwichman

Prev by Date: [Pen-l] Torturing Democracy
Next by Date: [Pen-l] North Korea's Real Crime
Previous by thread: Re: It's the metonymy, stupid! (was Re: [Pen-l] Re: De-Growth Conference Declaration)
Next by thread: [Pen-l] Economists Who Make the Third Stimulus Honor Roll
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: It's the metonymy, stupid! (was Re: [Pen-l] Re: De-Growth Conference Declaration), (continued)
- [Pen-l] June conference will address growth, Eugene Coyle Thu 28 May 2009, 19:06 GMT
- [Pen-l] Offshore; Food, Inc., Louis Proyect Thu 28 May 2009, 18:00 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] Offshore; Food, Inc., ravi Thu 28 May 2009, 18:24 GMT
    - Re: [Pen-l] Offshore; Food, Inc., Louis Proyect Thu 28 May 2009, 18:31 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]