Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time
From: ravi <ravi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:07:09 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=platosbeard.org; h=Received:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer:X-Identified-User; b=icYgpTV91/ZVCuQX0DBQzT1ICgVNL4dwVlgYOWI0BCAadssXgC7qIVo8lqfskcqncQRAnrGlLs4Kb8PX+iasuBSIijbB/Nop4l1JJbxX57YYyqth7EEiDmYf3m+L5Qdj;

On May 29, 2009, at 3:59 PM, raghu wrote:

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:38 PM, ravi <ravi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That may not be a good example... remember the RISC craze of the late-80s, early-90s. After all, Moore's Law is not a real law.
Yes, but the old CISC chips never went away. The RISC technologies
merely increased the menu of choices, which was really my point.

True, but the argument among RISC triumphalists was that their ideas should indeed replace CISC. But I get your point...

	--ravi


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

References:
- [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time
  - From: raghu
- Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time
  - From: ravi
- Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time
  - From: raghu

Prev by Date: Re: It's the metonymy, stupid! (was Re: [Pen-l] Re: De-Growth Conference Declaration)
Next by Date: Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time
Previous by thread: Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time
Next by thread: Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [Pen-l] thoughts for the day, Dan Scanlan Fri 29 May 2009, 20:56 GMT
- [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time, raghu Fri 29 May 2009, 18:26 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time, ravi Fri 29 May 2009, 19:05 GMT
    - Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time, raghu Fri 29 May 2009, 19:26 GMT
      
      Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time, ravi Fri 29 May 2009, 19:34 GMT
      
      Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time, Michael Perelman Fri 29 May 2009, 19:34 GMT
      
      Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time, Doyle Saylor Fri 29 May 2009, 19:39 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time, Jim Devine Fri 29 May 2009, 19:34 GMT
    - Re: [Pen-l] The Science Arrow of Time, raghu Fri 29 May 2009, 20:25 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]