PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: [Pen-l] De-Growth Conference Declaration



Thanks, Hans. I was interested to see Tim Jackson listed as one of the conference participants. He is the author of the Sustainable Development Commission's "Prosperity without Growth?" report. Here is a point-form summary of that report by David Bent of Forum for the Future:
  1. Economic growth fails to deliver prosperity, now or in the future. Poorer nations urgently need further economic development, but do already-rich nations?
  2. The current turmoil and recession is the result of the sort of growth we were pursuing.
  3. Understanding prosperity as possessions or income has failed because, beyond a certain point, more of either does not increase people's life satisfaction or development indicators.
  4. The growth dilemma: The current economic configuration means that growth is unsustainable but "de-growth" (planned reductions in economic output) is unstable.
  5. There has been relative decoupling (less impact per unit of activity) in the recent past, but we need absolute decoupling (less impact in total).
  6. We are currently trapped in an "iron cage" of production and consumption of novelty.
  7. A green stimulus is sensible in the short term but still assumes a return to continual consumption growth.
  8. A new macroeconomics for sustainability would be based on stability, distributional equality, sustainable levels of throughput and protecting natural resources.
  9. The current culture of consumption will need to become a social logic of "flourishing within limits."
  10. Governments need to find a new way of ensuring stability that also secures the future of prosperity.
http://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2009/05/28/understanding-prosperity-without-growth


On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:00 PM, ehrbar <ehrbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm just paging through the Proceedings of a De-Growth conference in
Paris last year, whose web site is

http://events.it-sudparis.eu/degrowthconference/en/

This 322 page pdf is a treasure box of articles dealing with the
Jevons Paradox, Georgescu-Roegen, Daly's steady state economics,
sustainable development, etc.  If you wonder where the relevant
literature about steady-state or no-growth economics is, this
collection is an excellent entry point.

Here is the declaration passed by the conference participants:

DECLARATION

We, participants in the Economic De-Growth For Ecological
Sustainability And Social Equity Conference held in Paris on April
18-19, 2008 make the following declaration:

 1. Economic growth (as indicated by increasing real GDP or GNP)
   represents an increase in production, consumption and investment
   in the pursuit of economic surplus, inevitably leading to
   increased use of materials, energy and land.

 2. Despite improvements in the ecological efficiency of the
   production and consumption of goods and services, global economic
   growth has resulted in increased extraction of natural resources
   and increased waste and emissions.

 3. Global economic growth has not succeeded in reducing poverty
   substantially, due to unequal exchange in trade and financial
   markets, which has increased inequality between countries.

 4. As the established principles of physics and ecology demonstrate,
   there is an eventual limit to the scale of global production and
   consumption, and to the scale national economies can attain
   without imposing environmental and social costs on others
   elsewhere or future generations.

 5. The best available scientific evidence indicates that the global
   economy has grown beyond ecologically sustainable limits, as have
   many national economies, especially those of the wealthiest
   countries (primarily industrialised countries in the global
   North).

 6. There is also mounting evidence that global growth in production
   and consumption is socially unsustainable and uneconomic (in the
   sense that its costs outweigh its benefits).

 7. By using more than their legitimate share of global environmental
   resources, the wealthiest nations are effectively reducing the
   environmental space available to poorer nations, and imposing
   adverse environmental impacts on them.

 8. If we do not respond to this situation by bringing global economic
   activity into line with the capacity of our ecosystems, and
   redistributing wealth and income globally so that they meet our
   societal needs, the result will be a process of involuntary and
   uncontrolled economic decline or collapse, with potentially
   serious social impacts, especially for the most disadvantaged.


We therefore call for a paradigm shift from the general and unlimited
pursuit of economic growth to a concept of "right-sizing" the global
and national economies.

 1. At the global level, "right-sizing" means reducing the global
   ecological footprint (including the carbon footprint) to a
   sustainable level.

 2. In countries where the per capita footprint is greater than the
   sustainable global level, rightsizing implies a reduction to this
   level within a reasonable timeframe.

 3. In countries where severe poverty remains, right-sizing implies
   increasing consumption by those in poverty as quickly as possible,
   in a sustainable way, to a level adequate for a decent life,
   following locally determined poverty-reduction paths rather than
   externally imposed development policies.

 4. This will require increasing economic activity in some cases; but
   redistribution of income and wealth both within and between
   countries is a more essential part of this process.


The paradigm shift involves degrowth in wealthy parts of the world.

 1. The process by which right-sizing may be achieved in the
   wealthiest countries, and in the global economy as a whole, is
   "degrowth".

 2. We define degrowth as a voluntary transition towards a just,
   participatory, and ecologically sustainable society.

 3. The objectives of degrowth are to meet basic human needs and
   ensure a high quality of life, while reducing the ecological
   impact of the global economy to a sustainable level, equitably
   distributed between nations. This will not be achieved by
   involuntary economic contraction.

 4. Degrowth requires a transformation of the global economic system
   and of the policies promoted and pursued at the national level, to
   allow the reduction and ultimate eradication of absolute poverty
   to proceed as the global economy and unsustainable national
   economies degrow.

 5. Once right-sizing has been achieved through the process of
   degrowth, the aim should be to maintain a "steady state economy"
   with a relatively stable, mildly fluctuating level of consumption.

 6. In general, the process of degrowth is characterised by:

 -- an emphasis on quality of life rather than quantity of
    consumption;

 -- the fulfilment of basic human needs for all;

 -- societal change based on a range of diverse individual and
    collective actions and policies;

 -- substantially reduced dependence on economic activity, and an
    increase in free time, unremunerated activity, conviviality,
    sense of community, and individual and collective health;

 -- encouragement of self-reflection, balance, creativity,
    flexibility, diversity, good citizenship, generosity, and
    non-materialism;

 -- observation of the principles of equity, participatory democracy,
    respect for human rights, and respect for cultural differences.


 7. Progress towards degrowth requires immediate steps towards efforts
   to mainstream the concept of degrowth into parliamentary and
   public debate and economic institutions; the development of
   policies and tools for the practical implementation of degrowth;
   and development of new, non-monetary indicators (including
   subjective indicators) to identify, measure and compare the
   benefits and costs of economic activity, in order to assess
   whether changes in economic activity contribute to or undermine
   the fulfilment of social and environmental objectives.




_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l



--
Sandwichman
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l


Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]