Re: [Pen-l] Prostitution

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Prostitution
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:04:33 -0400


On May 26, 2009, at 3:00 PM, David B. Shemano wrote:

That is a very skewed view of male sexuality. The old world assumed a view of male sexuality as natural and then tried to constrain it. The modern world assumes the same male sexuality as pathological and wants to change it. Good luck.

And you seem to see male sexuality as unitary and immutable. Scratch a libertarian and find a biological determinist.

Doug
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

References:
- RE: Re: [Pen-l] Prostitution
  - From: David B. Shemano

Prev by Date: RE: Re: [Pen-l] Prostitution
Next by Date: [Pen-l] prostitution and "harm reduction"
Previous by thread: RE: Re: [Pen-l] Prostitution
Next by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Prostitution
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] List, not our mailing list, (continued)
  - Re: [Pen-l] List, not our mailing list, michael a. lebowitz Mon 25 May 2009, 20:20 GMT
    - RE: [Pen-l] List, not our mailing list, Perelman, Michael Tue 26 May 2009, 03:15 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Prostitution, Jim Devine Mon 25 May 2009, 15:19 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - RE: Re: [Pen-l] Prostitution, David B. Shemano Tue 26 May 2009, 18:25 GMT
    - Re: [Pen-l] Prostitution, Doug Henwood Tue 26 May 2009, 18:31 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] Prostitution, raghu Tue 26 May 2009, 19:45 GMT
  - RE: Re: [Pen-l] Prostitution, David B. Shemano Wed 27 May 2009, 02:49 GMT
    - Re: [Pen-l] Prostitution, Doug Henwood Wed 27 May 2009, 02:53 GMT
    - Re: [Pen-l] Prostitution, Doyle Saylor Wed 27 May 2009, 03:39 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]