That's because sex *is* special and not just another form of work. This is so trivially obvious that I am surprised that it is even necessary to point it out.
What is trivially obvious is [therefore] grist for non-analysis. ;-)
--ravi
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, Shane Mage Tue 19 May 2009, 19:15 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, ravi Tue 19 May 2009, 19:25 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, Jim Devine Tue 19 May 2009, 19:30 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, raghu Tue 19 May 2009, 19:32 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, ravi Tue 19 May 2009, 19:50 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, Michael Perelman Tue 19 May 2009, 20:03 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, ravi Tue 19 May 2009, 20:10 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, raghu Tue 19 May 2009, 20:40 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, Dan Scanlan Tue 19 May 2009, 20:10 GMT