On May 19, 2009, at 2:18 PM, raghu wrote:
I am not sure I understand. The links you pointed to seem to advocate for decriminalization and more rights for sex workers. That's kind of orthogonal to my point about most sex-workers being poor and destitute and lacking in choice. I assume that this is not factually in dispute - if so I am happy to dig up some data.
But our fireman-in-chief sez no more. So I'll stop. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, Michael Perelman Tue 19 May 2009, 17:37 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, raghu Tue 19 May 2009, 17:55 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, Jim Devine Tue 19 May 2009, 18:01 GMT
- [Pen-l] Prostitution, poverty, facts, and choice, ravi Tue 19 May 2009, 18:05 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, Doug Henwood Tue 19 May 2009, 18:10 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, raghu Tue 19 May 2009, 18:35 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, Doug Henwood Tue 19 May 2009, 18:55 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, Jim Devine Tue 19 May 2009, 19:01 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] supply & demand at work, Doug Henwood Tue 19 May 2009, 18:55 GMT