Re: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?
From: Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:23:00 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bVT7u9JxD232I5fa8sSd6QrmY+oj2uFOMV/5tPI1ats=; b=M81oET6bmm06TVk+l/udVSS270Drxr2ZqQCQcVFQQgBHOpu3czMD5KywgguO8tWVnS GKa228+ry57y/FGIn+ReqycGlg8sRcQWBCpoC7Ddo9lB2O6C+lrEs8A6pyELdLL9JcEk 8Y/nDekxgkzmWFK386eACnQ17qh6J3bHNKIaw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I5pLHtvXrldA6xn4gnvMaKcgDdNzp3aqKFw532gFx7ILnCIgPeKgQmshmF7IYQj+WM 5/aS32kZ0bl7NreSym3mLumJN76O9QID4FkM+YwAiUT6LC8sSCdmCQjt9Xk7HzDQhFZ4 qf52iRQDJzsdtQx5h5tnJBoVo/D7WKEnP3/jM=

raghu wrote:
> Only government bonds
> are entirely risk-free.

that's not as true as it used to be.

-- 
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

References:
- [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?
  - From: Bill Lear
- Re: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?
  - From: Doug Henwood
- Re: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?
  - From: raghu
- RE: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?
  - From: Max B. Sawicky
- Re: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?
  - From: raghu

Prev by Date: RE: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?
Next by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?
Previous by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?
Next by thread: RE: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?, (continued)
  - RE: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?, Max B. Sawicky Mon 18 May 2009, 16:44 GMT
    - Re: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?, Bill Lear Mon 18 May 2009, 17:59 GMT
      
      RE: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?, Max B. Sawicky Mon 18 May 2009, 18:49 GMT
      
      RE: [Pen-l] Vulnerable logic in Dean Baker's argument?, Laurent GUERBY Tue 19 May 2009, 07:17 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]