PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] Question on T Accounts
- To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Question on T Accounts
- From: Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:48:01 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nAF5h+jeDAH5w8fVQMzEgO/C9rFx5rxxrAhBtIgxkVs=; b=oHv1ZIb0dQJWqAbjBNMEjVTuUMppNiZICPPlJlJ4pqZzoZGw+jqza8W9VHFhPGRe4C VJzlmfaObsa1v3qekb9x/e0R2IZkxC5JpcQAHSoIAJMnNxaS4CK/3cgluaK0IqoySO8+ M2JKiOrQ3v3n1py0OH268es2WvpU5nPa1gbuU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qe5pcIideOzBGSd/1aVm4PygnB059HabMjtuvIAvLkDZUfqyII8qopVBvhqai3gnnc S8HHYrvNxZaMx72gzNqG7BqHyF6MkJDTpU6BhWt3DeaLp1l6CmYgwXFcJRUWFTtMXUNg fM147deys5XOM9VbnGeJYlDoSmcIrm2CHW2aA=
Bill Lear wrote:
> I'm reading Randy Wray's book on money, and took a detour through
> Heilbroner and Galbraith's *The Economic Problem*. On p. 335, they
> introduce the notion of a "T account" and say, regarding assets and
> liabilities: "it is obvious that the two sides of the balance sheet
> must always come to the same total. *The total of assets and
> the total of liabilities are an identity*." (emphasis in original)
I don't know how many people follow this convention, but I distinguish
a "balance sheet" from a "T chart." In a balance sheet, assets =
liabilities + net worth (A = L + NW), with both L and NW on the
left-hand side. In a T-chart exercise, on the other hand, it's
typically assumed that NW does not change, so that the _change_ in
liabilities = the change in assets (where both liabilities and assets
are positive numbers) so that the change in assets (dA) - the change
in liabilities (dL) = 0.[*]
If they're talking about a balance sheet, H&G must be assuming that NW
= 0. Or they're talking about a T chart and changes in A and L,
assuming that NW is constant.
> I'm trying to work through some examples based on some of Wray's
> writings and I'm having trouble understanding how T accounts work
> when, to me, it appears you can have assets with no corresponding
> liability, and the identity mentioned above falls apart.
yes, NW does not correspond to L. It's the excess of A beyond L. It's
what's called equity capital, capital, or equity.
> For example, let's say I purchase some land, and a bank building, and
> have $1 million in cash with which to open a bank. I put
> the cash in the vault and open my doors for business, ready to prey
> upon ... uh serve the public.
>
> At this point, before any other accounts have been opened, what does
> the T account for the bank look like? The assets would be the $1
> million, but what are the liabilities? Would it be my ownership
> stake, i.e., shares of the company that I own?
the bank has no liabilities at this point. Your shares are claims on
NW. They do not represent debt (L).
[*] of course, NW does change, often without warning. For example, it
could turn out that a lot of the A are worthless paper, based on
sub-prime mortgages, financial engineering, Ponzi schemes, etc. Of
course, that never happens.
--
Jim Devine / "If heart-aches were commercials, we'd all be on TV." -- John Prine
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]