PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] Excellent article on Jared Diamond and the New Yorker
- To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Excellent article on Jared Diamond and the New Yorker
- From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:47:28 -0700
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Wouldn't it be fair to say that these societies have a different kind of
complexity, rather than less complexity? I wrote this in Steal This Idea:
Edgar Anderson, who was associated with Missouri Botanical Garden of St.
Louis, during the last 5,000 years, modern society has not domesticated a
single plant that primitive cultures had not already used. He pointed out
that traditional cultures had already managed to discover all five natural
sources of caffeine: coffee, tea, the cola plant, cacao, yerba mate and its
relatives (Anderson 1952, pp. 132-33).
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:41:01PM -0700, raghu wrote:
>
>
> While acknowledging the truth of this statement, is it nevertheless
> not true that industrial societies are orders of magnitude bigger,
> more interconnected and more complex than tribal cultures? In the same
> way that a large factory is more complex than a garage workshop.
>
> It seems to me that the danger lies in translating "more complex" into
> "superior" or "better".
> -raghu.
>
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]