PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Pen-l] US labor-power market statistics
- To: Pen-l <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Pen-l] US labor-power market statistics
- From: Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 09:16:51 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BbGM8Gl3XbN3iLTAlrhGeD6MBa0Wsvt1JxrrshwpjR8=; b=oZxubm1d4qG++0vi/TrG+lziqN12W5RCT17PSwcDxnnGCHrLazDqLyH86gd9LmcBY9 4V/udUdFPsrIffJbRI3HNZXtoTRi9aQv+kxawCa3DsM6mRgQivMIw3+XO2AwdxkOpnHB eMfqkKmxcha7G+QULAe3Sg/vdPhj88Eyw0v2U=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=bSyETLRyvYE+t88juL5ttGC7zz8RDnH+dpCjl+LzDI9hrgnJ69Qgg4AR23Z1hUnDA8 8dx7qSfbePKKWBfsxuiBWj7Ba19hixgP4bDSDJafgprqJ+128ZuQtkU7M8ri/hTLX76i hhbwCCNJiF8OWoh9BcWswoavaeWdsIm9AiPHg=
from Dean Baker:
Three Items Missed on the April Jobs Numbers
In the worst downturn since the Great Depression, losing just 539,000
jobs in a month may seem like good news, but there is less cause for
optimism than most reporters recognized.
First, most reports did note the one-time event of 62,000 people being
hired for the 2010 Census. The Census will be employing part-time
workers for much of the next year, but this hiring will not be
repeated (or at least not at this rate) in future months. So, the net
of Census job loss was 601,000. This is still an improvement over the
680,000 average job loss for the prior five months.
However, this comparison ignores the fact that we are comparing
revised data from the prior five months with unrevised data for April.
The revisions for the last five months have all been negative in a big
way, adding an average of 86,000 to reported job loss. We don't know
whether the revisions will be that large again in April, or even that
they will be negative, but a word of caution is certainly in order.
Second, It is worth noting that the number of jobs imputed for new
firms not included in the Labor Department's survey continues to
outpace the number for 2008. There were 226,000 jobs imputed for new
firms in April of 2009 compared with just 176,000 for April of 2008.
Given the health of the economy in 2009 compared with 2008, this seems
unlikely.
Third, wage growth appears to have collapsed with the average hourly
wage reportedly increasing by less than 0.1 percent in the April data.
This is consistent with a sharp slowing of the rate of wage growth
reported in the Employment Cost Index for the first quarter.
This is very disturbing. Wage growth had been holding up earlier in
the downturn, which meant that workers (at least those who still had
jobs) were seeing increased purchasing power and were therefore able
to sustain their consumption. It now seems that weakness in the labor
market has brought wage growth to a halt. This is likely to further
reduce consumption and demand more generally.
In short, while we can always say that this report could have been
worse, there was not much to celebrate here.
--
Jim Devine / "If heart-aches were commercials, we'd all be on TV." -- John Prine
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- RE: [Pen-l] Excellent article on Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, (continued)
- [Pen-l] Žižek, Lenin and firing squads,
Louis Proyect Mon 11 May 2009, 18:15 GMT
- [Pen-l] US labor-power market statistics,
Jim Devine Mon 11 May 2009, 15:45 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Thoughts on science, for idiots, from Lewontin,
ravi Mon 11 May 2009, 15:29 GMT
- [Pen-l] Unemployment rates of blacks vs. whites,
Bill Lear Mon 11 May 2009, 13:54 GMT
- [Pen-l] RE: private vs. state colleges,
z l Mon 11 May 2009, 10:45 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]