On May 9, 2009, at 9:07 AM, Jim Devine wrote:
Astrologers don't do that sort of stage-magic trick. Anyway, a sample of one has very limited statistical significance (nor am I, though literate, a competent astrologer).to test astrology's validity, I'll tell you all the details about my life (except my birthday and related) and you tell me when I was born.
Shane Mage
This cosmos did none of gods or men make, but it always was and is and shall be: an everlasting fire, kindling in measures and going out in measures." Herakleitos of Ephesos
Start with something much simpler. Take fifty matched pairs--one a lottery
winner, one a victim of a fatal automobile accident. Give birth
day/time/place and event day/time place for each to 200 professional
astrologers (sample size=10,000). Tell them to identify which was which in
each case. Test the percentage of correct identifications for statistical
significance.
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- [Pen-l] Thoughts on science, for idiots, from Lewontin, (continued)
- [Pen-l] Thoughts on science, for idiots, from Lewontin, ravi Sat 09 May 2009, 01:52 GMT
- [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2, Sabri Oncu Sat 09 May 2009, 04:02 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2, Shane Mage Sat 09 May 2009, 04:25 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2, Jim Devine Sat 09 May 2009, 12:35 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2, Shane Mage Sat 09 May 2009, 16:25 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2, Jim Devine Sat 09 May 2009, 19:05 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2, Shane Mage Sat 09 May 2009, 19:50 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2, raghu Sat 09 May 2009, 21:15 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2, Jim Devine Sun 10 May 2009, 01:11 GMT