PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] pseudoscience [was: Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
- To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] pseudoscience [was: Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
- From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 07:43:15 -0700
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
I am working on a book on 17C & early 18th C economists. At the time there
was a wierd mix of science & superstition. Astrologers were seen as
scientists, especially because some of their observations were useful for
navigators. Earlier John Dee, the court astrologer, was a major figure in
developing mathematics and astrology.
The history of medicine has numerous "scientific" practices that turned out
to be hokum, but haven't some of the "primitive" procedures turned out to
have merit?
That seems to be what Jim meant by a critical approach to science?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- [Pen-l] Nader on Health insurance,
Dan Scanlan Sat 09 May 2009, 15:54 GMT
- [Pen-l] Capitalism and the state (cont'd),
Marv Gandall Sat 09 May 2009, 13:41 GMT
- [Pen-l] pseudoscience [was: Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2,
Jim Devine Sat 09 May 2009, 12:56 GMT
- [Pen-l] Are AIG employees using bailout money to pay selected off counterparties in order to get jobs with them?,
michael perelman Sat 09 May 2009, 04:45 GMT
- [Pen-l] Thoughts on science, for idiots, from Lewontin,
Sabri Oncu Sat 09 May 2009, 02:06 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]