PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
Greetings Economists,
All well and good to cite the method. However, let's take cosmology
as a good example. String theory is a dominate academic view of the
smallest events. Proving string theory is difficult. There are many
competing views of the physics at the quantum level. How does one
remove the faith based element that drives a researcher in thrall to
string theory?
Doyle
On May 8, 2009, at 8:36 PM, Doug Henwood wrote:
I dunno, there is this thing called the scientific method, involving
hypothesis testing and reproducibility and all that. It can't answer
all questions, but it sure can answer a lot of them.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2, (continued)
Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2,
raghu Sat 09 May 2009, 02:30 GMT
Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2,
raghu Sat 09 May 2009, 08:01 GMT
Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2,
Jim Devine Sat 09 May 2009, 00:18 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]