Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
From: ravi <ravi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 21:07:41 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=platosbeard.org; h=Received:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer:X-Identified-User; b=pitQHmTsEfovivYol30BK6kebptRdptyDUdH9Lt+/AfVuasDoTI/d4Dx56H4Qt4vASXtWZxz2NE323AQS1Zc0m4g0Vv4r0p5X6QIg2qo3cDYmxa3D0OYOQboKssdhsng;

On May 8, 2009, at 8:16 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:

If ravi wants to argue with
the ad executives who make tv ads beginning "Science Tells Us," fine -
but he shouldmake it clear that he is writing off topic, that what he
says is irrelevant to what anyone on this list says.

Michael,

don't you think this sort of thing is a bit ridiculous? Does Carrol really speak for the list and is he even half-right in this sort of characterisation? If he is, then I would be glad to shut up,

	--ravi


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

References:
- [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: Louis Proyect
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: ravi
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: Carrol Cox
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: raghu
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: Carrol Cox

Prev by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Idiotic thread on science
Next by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Idiotic responses about threads
Previous by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
Next by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2, (continued)

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]