Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 20:53:52 -0400


On May 8, 2009, at 8:48 PM, Doyle Saylor wrote:

Or as most people say here with no particular precision, 'reductionism'. If Ravi lines up the current 'reductionist' line up and calls their blather tyranny, in most ways Gould would have agreed. And said a lot of the same things against sociobiology. Read Ravi's statement again.

I wasn't arguing with Ravi, I was arguing with what I quoted from Raghu. Read the post again.

Doug
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: Doyle Saylor

References:
- [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: Louis Proyect
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: ravi
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: Carrol Cox
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: raghu
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: Jim Devine
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: raghu
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: Doug Henwood
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: Doyle Saylor

Prev by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
Next by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Idiotic thread on science
Previous by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
Next by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2, (continued)

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]