[Pen-l] Idiotic thread on science

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Pen-l] Idiotic thread on science
From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 20:51:34 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)

ravi wrote:

My notion of science doesn’t matter. The question is: which side, of the two described above, holds the centre (and power) in science today?

I can't stand the fact that something I wrote on my blog has triggered such a useless discussion so I have changed the subject heading. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Pen-l] Idiotic thread on science
  - From: raghu
- Re: [Pen-l] Idiotic responses about threads
  - From: ravi
- Re: [Pen-l] Idiotic thread on science
  - From: Michael Perelman

References:
- [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: Louis Proyect
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: ravi
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: Carrol Cox
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: ravi

Prev by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
Next by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
Previous by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
Next by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Idiotic thread on science
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2, (continued)

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]