Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
From: Doyle Saylor <doylesaylor@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 17:44:56 -0700

Greetings Economists, It is obvious from what Ravi wrote he is not saying that. You twist his words. Doyle On May 8, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:

You mean there is no difference between (say) Pinker & Summers on the one hand, Levins, Lewontin, & Gould on the other? You take your notion of science from the likes of Summers, which puts you on his side of the argument.


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: ravi

References:
- [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: Louis Proyect
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: ravi
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
  - From: Carrol Cox

Prev by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
Next by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
Previous by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
Next by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Jared Diamond and the New Yorker, part 2, (continued)

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]