Re: [Pen-l] Going Dutch

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Going Dutch
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:03:15 -0400


On May 6, 2009, at 5:55 PM, raghu wrote:

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
C'mon folks. Is it because you've never been on the right that you can't imagine an intelligent answer to this sort of claim? They're different from welfare recipients because they're working hard and increasing their earning potential, which will more than pay off society's investment in them over the long term. Welfare recipients are just a deadweight loss.
That is an "intelligent" response?? I'll assume you were being sarcastic.

Look, I don't agree with it at all, but it's an argument that needs refutation, and not something you can dismiss with an eyeroll. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Pen-l] Going Dutch
  - From: Bill Lear
- Re: [Pen-l] Going Dutch
  - From: raghu
- Re: [Pen-l] Going Dutch
  - From: Shane Mage

References:
- [Pen-l] Going Dutch
  - From: Bill Lear
- Re: [Pen-l] Going Dutch
  - From: Max Sawicky
- RE: [Pen-l] Going Dutch
  - From: Carl Dassbach
- Re: [Pen-l] Going Dutch
  - From: Jim Devine
- Re: [Pen-l] Going Dutch
  - From: Doug Henwood
- Re: [Pen-l] Going Dutch
  - From: raghu

Prev by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Going Dutch
Next by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Going Dutch
Previous by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Going Dutch
Next by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Going Dutch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- RE: [Pen-l] Going Dutch, (continued)

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]