On May 1, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Jim Devine wrote:
Doug Henwood wrote:The tentative plan is for the union to get one board seat,
despite owning 55% of the stock - the same as the government of Canada,
which will hold 2% of the stock.
according to the UAW's Gettelfinger (interviewed on US National Public Radio this a.m.), it's not the union that will own the stock but instead the fund that controls the medical insurance. Also, he said that the stock would be sold soon, because they _had_ to sell it.
Doug _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- [Pen-l] Can anyone explain this, Michael Perelman Fri 01 May 2009, 18:09 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Can anyone explain this, Doug Henwood Fri 01 May 2009, 18:22 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Can anyone explain thisy, Michael Perelman Fri 01 May 2009, 18:47 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Can anyone explain this, Jim Devine Fri 01 May 2009, 19:00 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Can anyone explain this, Doug Henwood Fri 01 May 2009, 19:16 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Can anyone explain this, michael a. lebowitz Fri 01 May 2009, 19:43 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Pen-l] Can anyone explain this, Waistline2 Fri 01 May 2009, 19:06 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Can anyone explain this, Waistline2 Fri 01 May 2009, 19:42 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Can anyone explain this, Waistline2 Fri 01 May 2009, 22:16 GMT