Re: [Pen-l] What good are economists?

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] What good are economists?
From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:51:18 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)

I half way agree with Fred.  The theory obscures essential parts of the 
economy.  A good number of us analyzed this beforehand -- many on this 
list, but we did it in spite of formal economic theory.


 -- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Pen-l] What good are economists?
  - From: Michael Perelman

References:
- [Pen-l] What good are economists?
  - From: Louis Proyect
- Re: [Pen-l] What good are economists?
  - From: fmoseley
- Re: [Pen-l] What good are economists?
  - From: Jim Devine
- Re: [Pen-l] What good are economists?
  - From: raghu

Prev by Date: Re: [Pen-l] What good are economists?
Next by Date: Re: [Pen-l] What good are economists?
Previous by thread: Re: [Pen-l] What good are economists?
Next by thread: Re: [Pen-l] What good are economists?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] What good are economists?, (continued)
- [Pen-l] China's downturn, Marv Gandall Mon 20 Apr 2009, 02:37 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] China's downturn, Jim Devine Mon 20 Apr 2009, 12:52 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]