PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] finance question
- To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] finance question
- From: Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:54:27 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wASmqjVnkEJffuAQ3v37OyYDTP32xiiwlzuu2Wtu+cI=; b=NlzjPjwiGFquFO0d5t6Vc/0g4pnLVynprSzpOrso//QNxOCHIZrrciqWS4GiV0mfyM 5foaovWamNrJMYt1li1fzP2Bb01dsmxYQVzjLTX9wA17jrwo/UmEqBUshbxBij+HYYnF OV5QhcE4JDEHkfQ7FXmYP4slK987YoaM7CT+Q=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oAI3+K2TLB4vBawKXwzKJlpwbIF0EEYBnaLqlzZlN2OBRk6t/3msI4tbvxZ19uoVJO jf7BUIpL0nuLbzxLoY/5COHn62tDLvxh0UXvZd92HqZtA1pwAAJb/fTuMNG0sH//Tm2v zTYpbd49zAP9fzZDGe3VblQL8fzlGMrZe75kE=
Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ... what happened with the debate about whether speculation or
> market manipulation could affect oil prices? I'm wondering because of the
> recent discussion about the urgency of preventing shortselling. Why would
> shortselling in stocks have an effect, but not speculation in oil?
I don't know about that, but Randy Wray had a good explanation of the
run-up of oil prices (up to mid 2008). As I said in an earlier pen-l
missive:
>>Randy Wray presented a talk on the current financial crisis. As usual,
his talk was extremely interesting and useful. Crucially, he pointed
to a simple explanation for the roller-coaster behavior of the markets
for commodities (oil, etc.) in recent years. Organizations such as
pension funds were allowed by deregulation not only to invest their
funds in commodities, but in commodity futures. Like fools, they
rushed in, buying oil futures and the like. This drove prices very
high. Then then pulled their funds out, having an obvious negative
effect on prices.
>>This explanation, as I see it, is more satisfying than simple
reference to speculation: first, the _new_ speculators rush in (with
new money) and then they rush out.<<
The old speculators' activities would exaggerate the resulting fluctuations.
--
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] this is your war / this is your war on drugs, (continued)
- [Pen-l] tell me why,
Dan Scanlan Sat 18 Apr 2009, 22:16 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Dani Rodriks loves tax havens,
Laurent GUERBY Sat 18 Apr 2009, 21:28 GMT
- [Pen-l] finance question,
Michael Perelman Sat 18 Apr 2009, 19:42 GMT
- [Pen-l] Mariategui's "Seven Essays on Peruvian Reality" now online,
Louis Proyect Sat 18 Apr 2009, 12:07 GMT
- [Pen-l] micromanagement,
McDonough, Terrence Sat 18 Apr 2009, 11:08 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]