|
One never knows, but I think it unlikely that North Korea is acting as
proxy for China. The main reason is that North Korean policy actions
end up triggering US responses that place China in somewhat difficult
positions given its general desire for good relations with the U.S.
For example, China would rather not have to deal with current security
council discussions on possible sanctions on North Korea. In fact, North Korea has become quite skillful at pushing its own policy line and forcing China to accommodate it and actually front for it in negotiations with the U.S. North Korea knows well that China does not want to see North Korea collapse and have a pro-U.S. Korean regime on its border. The North Koreans are pretty tough and have broken with China and with the old Soviet Union at various points in the past when they felt that they were being pushed to hard. Marty Gernot Koehler wrote: Marty Hart-Landsberg (05apr09) raised concerns about US policy with respect to North Korea. |
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Re: [Pen-l] Re query, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] Re query, Jim Devine Tue 07 Apr 2009, 02:43 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Re query, Doug Henwood Tue 07 Apr 2009, 03:07 GMT
- [Pen-l] Norman Solomon: there’s no there there, Louis Proyect Mon 06 Apr 2009, 20:58 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] the Korean situation, Gernot Koehler Mon 06 Apr 2009, 20:11 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] the Korean situation, Martin Hart-Landsberg Mon 06 Apr 2009, 20:21 GMT
- [Pen-l] Luis Gutierrez - opinions on his newsletter?, mckenna193 Wed 08 Apr 2009, 11:31 GMT
- [Pen-l] query, Jim Devine Mon 06 Apr 2009, 18:14 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] query, Doug Henwood Mon 06 Apr 2009, 18:30 GMT
- [Pen-l] Query:Bond holders and failed banks and funds, Gar Lipow Mon 06 Apr 2009, 17:05 GMT