On Apr 1, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Jim Devine wrote:
I find insights here and there in the right wing stuff quite often. There's a point, I have noticed, where strong left views and congruent with strong right views. It's not unusual to find two paths to the same conclusion.
Again, being a monetary crank film doesn't bother me, per se. What does bother me, i.e., what I don't understand, is how anyone is allowed to create money by simply accepting a promise, then using that promise as a basis for creating more money, er, promises.
Here's one concept where I get lost. I don't know what this -- Austries' -- means. Is this an economist's nuance or is this a verifiable phenomenon? I don't know.
Question: Is getting rid of credit the same as getting rid of Capitalism? Jim, I really appreciate your time checking out this video and responding. Dan "Some banks are too big to live." -- Rodd Gnawkin |
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Re: [Pen-l] I want to know, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] I want to know, Doug Henwood Fri 03 Apr 2009, 22:15 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] I want to know, Louis Proyect Fri 03 Apr 2009, 22:31 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] I want to know, Doug Henwood Fri 03 Apr 2009, 22:54 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] I want to know, Carrol Cox Fri 03 Apr 2009, 22:58 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] I want to know, Dan Scanlan Fri 03 Apr 2009, 21:11 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] I want to know, Jim Devine Fri 03 Apr 2009, 21:50 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] I want to know, Doug Henwood Fri 03 Apr 2009, 22:14 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] I want to know, Jeffrey Fisher Sat 04 Apr 2009, 00:52 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] I want to know, Jim Devine Sat 04 Apr 2009, 14:50 GMT