PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Pen-l] democracy
- To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Pen-l] democracy
- From: Charles Brown <cdb1003@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=prodigy.net; s=s1024; t=1237204035; bh=bgpKcULMve8fNRo2kPZeUCuYuj26/L1fzNkYmBcPx84=; h=Message-ID:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qkvdnxJbY5+5kb3O4eILUm2N4OTPdIT71QQc+97/55hA0VBs5TBPb8QTVT0XMZJVQlVFQG0WecPR+8yZFn61Hr1VxGuZzT5yPtn3zwDWz9UxFWmyuWUfZy3oj/gsn9w8LeWzY+6SIU6tGURQdS3XzKlElm4E2tMiWgLwYBNg5Qw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=prodigy.net; h=Message-ID:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Or8zQubhEXEFDYkrKFAkjIqWN6PNLsOQwKrqnoC/hPgepy0aYKb0L+hp4310CXJjx3rtEMlY8/5MDIv8h3YQW0R+Lh5dz2FT2Ef68USFUIMzKSU5ktaHoI0EOBTSQGrcxz25QafrahmM7+b4Y8Qo7OJSRyBPQURzoqFcPwsN0/I=;
In the Russian and Chinese cases then, an analysis in terms of these ideas would examine the extent to which peasant conditions in each case were productive of an "individuality" characterized by significant "superstition" and "prejudice" and the extent to which the "revolutions" in question led to a "more or less centralised despotism".
In so far as they were so productive and did so lead, they not only did not create "socialist" productive relations in Marx's sense, they instead created relations incapable of producing the degree of "integral development of every individual producer" required to create such relations. They would eventually lead, therefore, not to "socialism", but to a social form consistent with the actual kind of "individuality" they did produce.
Ted
^^^^^^
CB: I don't think it is accurate
to say that the influence of the
Soviet state on the Russian peasants
was to perpetuate or develop
"superstition" and "prejudice"
On the contrary, it developed a
atheism, scientific and internationalist
worldview
in them, probably more than
in the US even.
Also, its influence
was the opposite of perpetuating
or causing isolation
and the lack of connexion between
the life of one commune (cooperatives)
and that of the others. It
de-localised and centralized.
It was a Union.
Thus, on your logic, the Soviet
Union very much developed the
old Russian peasant communes in
a way that produced individuals
capable of creating the
penultimate state of communism,
i.e. socialism.
The problem with the SU
was not inadequate or non-integrated
individual
development, but the world
historic slaughter and
material/economic destruction
and threat of slaughter
and destruction wrought
on the SU by capitalism
including especially Nazism
and the US. The SU had
to militarize its social
structure and spend too much
on defense, it being genuine
defense given the
history of gigantic assaults
, not preparation
for offense as in the US.
This military threat was
a critical factor in China's
detour to capitalist relations
of production,too.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Brilliant: [All UofO Students] URGENT: GRADES HURT, END THE PAIN, TOMORROW, (continued)
- [Pen-l] Man the hunted,
Charles Brown Mon 16 Mar 2009, 12:04 GMT
- [Pen-l] democracy,
Charles Brown Mon 16 Mar 2009, 11:18 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]