[Pen-l] democracy

[Charles Brown <cdb1003@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Marx's own understanding of the consequences of such an "ndividuality", therefore, a "revolution" for which it was "responsible" - in the sense that the "individuality" of "masses" of 19th century French peasants was "responsbile" for Napoleon III - would not only not produce a penultimate social form - "socialism" - from which all barriers to the full "integral development of every producer" had been reomved, it would produce instead a "despotism" inconsistent with generating even that degree of "integral development" required to initiate the kind of "revolutionary praxis" necessary to create "socialism".


Ted
 
^^^^^
CB: If I understand you,
your analysis would also
apply to China in the
mid 20th Century.
 
Do you consider that
therefore China had
to go through a
capitalist stage to
develop the requisite
integration of every
individual producer's
personality for
socialism ?

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l