PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] Query: Credit default swaps: what stops a "run on the bank"?
- To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Query: Credit default swaps: what stops a "run on the bank"?
- From: Max Sawicky <maxbsawicky@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:07:23 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qbTM/O7eKzmTegNdCiDvBpXc0H5MMl0bEilN4Xnd2Jc=; b=TQR+LHH453F7L1TWOaomw+TVvcHIYmIuJB416m2oVuwjOyO3jYDzhhgXqcOyATcMo4 /R4LN9zzOQFRIhqdKOhW93Mft/6Nxb1YpQGWAvCNwNJj/mGVyZjDHqtFwm8EPwIScEB9 PMYevDMAP6Ny1XvtwbeQnKPeiNpwAnOLjvPk0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pwCq9pRXttHxvy5qWGJhrZhV3gZ35UgwwyPSQ27F/AGcCc2VCtUsm/yJyFfRe8IqFq xQhGf6Z9B1J+XMOiqoztNSpn1iZqGoLguJk6mLjrBYwpka15PTykDg2dXx8Ww0FJAdxx Dj1D3l3+/FqYervMutBP5x5ncdCTnEL4tzGd4=
I know nothing about CDS's, but in general when you have a lot of a
certain asset that you think is shaky, the act of trying to unload it
can cause its value to drop even further. So you take a possibly
bigger bath selling than holding. Similar to the adage, when you owe
somebody $100 you have a creditor. When you owe them a million, you
have a partner.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Gar Lipow <gar.lipow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >From what I understand there are 40 trillion dollars in credit default
> swaps out there, 20 trillion of which are callable against AIG. U.S.
> 2008 GDP was around 14 trillion. So what has prevented a "run on the
> bank"? What has kept all of them from being called?
>
> I'm guessing it has to be some combination of the following
>
> 1) Not all of them have had the conditions under which they can be
> called met, and some of the one that could be called are against
> assets in good enough shape that the asset holder prefers the asset to
> the exercising the option.
>
> 2) The CDSs are concentrated in few enough hands to exercise
> discretion in calling them - the way a bank with only one depositor
> might be able to avoid a run.
>
> Anyone out there willing to explain this?
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Is Summers correct about this?, (continued)
- [Pen-l] Query: Credit default swaps: what stops a "run on the bank"?,
Gar Lipow Fri 13 Mar 2009, 16:59 GMT
- [Pen-l] The US Financial System is Effectively Insolvent,
Charles Brown Fri 13 Mar 2009, 16:42 GMT
- [Pen-l] As capitalism stares into the abyss, was Marx right all along? ( Yes),
Charles Brown Fri 13 Mar 2009, 16:11 GMT
- [Pen-l] Commentary: Chrysler secrecy is a big stick,
Charles Brown Fri 13 Mar 2009, 14:54 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]