PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] Obama , getting money to the working class pronto
- To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Obama , getting money to the working class pronto
- From: Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 16:03:55 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6Doa6PLmRJHyPETB4ka47dqwzuZwxuBwSNZaoGMhYrY=; b=d5kpZTp+4g7+Bwuzv/DL4n3ekkcySHiOpNzTvlYYSLzCS5jxxuoD0uStMhFHZSYFZi z2DUOsmYSSDLCLmvfb79+sohZnBr/SVhAM1IMWcIEaDnL2HzFMRcvWSGQPbtgYYWfh42 Vybn1KZsLxOBLSNb4q75h00T9yV/D/B2IY0uo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ggywUTGePVd/W2R7hZxRDExl4kZuJNI3GzEGQHf4jd8Ok6KQfMazL7OeDC9bc50I1T dODEwXw4iTmPTGsEmPee96A3HUEEFSQiJgSoejvPR81G8KKOejikz13a+TOFr3bBGQfd J37xgMafDgA70Og+Pfl2Pv5nJYCJ2zdwqaWsY=
since when is David Brooks "a moderate"? I guess someone can use any
tag he or she wants. I'm a superhero.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:56 PM, michael perelman
<michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What does this mean?
>
> "The Medicare reform represents a big cut in entitlement spending. It
> amounts to means-testing the system. It introduces more competition and cuts
> corporate welfare. These are all Republican ideas."
>
> Is this what he meant?
>
> "Over the long run, Obama has insisted that health care reform will be
> deficit-neutral. Many experts believe this will force Democrats to reduce
> the tax exemption for employee insurance benefits in order to raise revenue.
> This idea is at the core of most conservative reform proposals."
>
>
> Max Sawicky wrote:
>>
>> All I've heard are crickets chirping re: the stunning O-budget.
>>
>> Though to be fair there was this disturbing bit today from that doofus
>> Brooks in the NY Times:
>>
>> "The White House has produced a chart showing nondefense discretionary
>> spending as a share of G.D.P. That’s spending for education, welfare
>> and all the stuff that Democrats love. Since 1985, this spending has
>> hovered around 3.7 percent of G.D.P. This year, it’s about 4.6
>> percent. The White House claims that it is going to reduce this
>> spending to 3.1 percent by 2019, lower than at any time in any recent
>> Republican administration. I was invited to hang this chart on my wall
>> and judge them by how well they meet these targets. (I have.)"
>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/06/opinion/06brooks.html?_r=1&ref=opinion
>>
>>
> --
> Michael Perelman
> Economics Department
> California State University
> Chico, CA
> 95929
>
> 530 898 5321
> fax 530 898 5901
> http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
--
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- [Pen-l] Obama , getting money to the working class pronto, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]