|
In principle charter schools could be regulated to address all
of those concerns. In practice the stressed school districts have their hands full
without trying to bird-dog the charters. In a sense, charters reduce the
management load and create some potential for the authorities to fix the remaining
schools, while enjoying less accountability for the charters. Iâve seen
nothing to indicate that has actually happened, but it seems possible. The biggest problem is the failures create irreversible harm for
the affected students. Anyone with a child in school can understand the
costs of blowing off half a year. To a fan of workers control, the idea of teachers getting the
wherewithal to invent and manage their own school is appealing. So I wouldnât
be too quick to condemn the whole project in any form. Vouchers are a completely different deal, with nothing to
recommend them IMO. From:
pen-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pen-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of 123hop@xxxxxxxxxxx The
problem with charter schools is that they are financed by public funds but do
not have the responsibility of public schools. |
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- [Pen-l] Arne Duncan & choice, Michael Perelman Fri 27 Feb 2009, 03:05 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] European carbon market crashing, Gar Lipow Fri 27 Feb 2009, 02:10 GMT
- [Pen-l] RE: charter schools, 123hop Fri 27 Feb 2009, 02:00 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] RE: charter schools, Michael Perelman Fri 27 Feb 2009, 02:13 GMT
- RE: [Pen-l] RE: charter schools, Max B. Sawicky Fri 27 Feb 2009, 02:36 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [Pen-l] RE: charter schools, Joanna Fri 27 Feb 2009, 04:29 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] RE: charter schools, Jim Devine Fri 27 Feb 2009, 13:52 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] RE: charter schools, ravi Fri 27 Feb 2009, 15:45 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] RE: charter schools, Jim Devine Fri 27 Feb 2009, 16:09 GMT