PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] what's the matter with Kansas?
- To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] what's the matter with Kansas?
- From: ravi <ravi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:23:29 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=platosbeard.org; h=Received:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer:X-Identified-User; b=jS3kgtSu65yMH4dNZ9KtaAGB4YGRjCKGcBG7CzcoH5vRFKKRZ4Z+v7dwnOQ0CuUD/83ra7EFBWdCuiSnX1zrWrNK/YPUizX4Q7U7L8PfiC7EPCQrZmYHJ6vmPHIGLM2w;
On Feb 21, 2009, at 8:18 PM, Jim Devine wrote:
after a month or two of intermittent reading, I just finished Thomas
Frank's book on Kansas. Can someone direct me to a leftist critique of
it?
Don't know of a leftist critique, but one of the standard ones is
Bartels:
http://www.princeton.edu/~bartels/kansas.pdf
I don't find his critique convincing (not for reasons of data or even
most of the analysis -- he offers pretty good background data from
which he attempts to derive his critique, but I think his entire
argument depends on, wrongly IMHO, a poor understanding of what is
meant by "working class" in the question "why does the working class
vote against its own interests?"). I have been hoping, for a while, to
post my thoughts/criticism of Bartels... but haven't had the time.
--ravi
--
Support something better than yourself ;-)
PeTA => http://peta.org/
Greenpeace => http://greenpeace.org/
If you have nothing better to read: http://platosbeard.org/
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]