Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1
From: Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:56:11 -0600

Marvin Gandall wrote:
> 
>or
> sizeable and coherent left opposition within the DP articulating the need of
> the population for higher levels of public spending.
> 

Just a footnote: "Within the DP" is incoherent. There is no such thing
as being "within" parties such as the RP & DP. "Within the DP"names a
nowhere.

Carrol

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1
  - From: Marvin Gandall
- Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1
  - From: Jim Devine

References:
- [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1
  - From: Julio Huato
- Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1
  - From: Marvin Gandall

Prev by Date: [Pen-l] The Good Old Days, Not So Progressive
Next by Date: Re: [Pen-l] why don't we legalize hitchhiking?
Previous by thread: Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1
Next by thread: Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1, Julio Huato Thu 12 Feb 2009, 17:27 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1, Jim Devine Thu 12 Feb 2009, 17:42 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1, Louis Proyect Thu 12 Feb 2009, 17:51 GMT
  - Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1, Marvin Gandall Thu 12 Feb 2009, 19:42 GMT
    - Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1, Carrol Cox Thu 12 Feb 2009, 20:28 GMT
      
      Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1, Jim Devine Thu 12 Feb 2009, 20:57 GMT
      
      Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1, Marvin Gandall Thu 12 Feb 2009, 21:32 GMT
      
      Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1, Bill Lear Thu 12 Feb 2009, 22:24 GMT
      
      Re: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1, Louis Proyect Thu 12 Feb 2009, 22:56 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]