PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] why don't we legalize hitchhiking?
- To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] why don't we legalize hitchhiking?
- From: Robert Naiman <naiman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:16:38 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q4Mgfp+Jm/7A6Yf0KCojGkPGHNlRwqABJdAxOmiDzLc=; b=AtYYy0AECdZYxtgEfEi2paW3zyf+W4yxPskdA2k9OqLZs2BUbY8CLZlLskxrWQc06Y gutq/5Gs8TaoHeWW55roqT+GJ9sAPZQHvTJz6v6/zQ8nHTNKLDxGBI0pUIFbs3EnxVtN kdrok5CmmaV0RsS2jckAFmIzi/cWTJ+h5dJH4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=qOG53/sZCjKjdvdUZI1vcNsg8KDK7q+fIAeRzVokevWTgtB50/wMvaGrJwmb12gc6Q PNKgIYGO2ZV5vqzyeWoFrQ25x1ou0cwF1s5U6flWZVQm4VJUf6MMASf4nwF5Ac8EFDgD PrKZ6Dg3CAOt5EqhkLJlnmuu5+UonVrUQdnSA=
I take your point. But I don't see it as necessarily a fatal
objection, on the grounds that in the worst case it's a subsidy for
having children, which is always popular; some other subsidy without
environmental content for having children could be reduced by way of
compensation, if people insist on it (I wouldn't); and maybe if you're
old enough to have a card, you're old enough to drive, so maybe the
fact that the card is in the house indicates that you're not driving
somewhere, which is the point.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Bill Lear <rael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 10, 2009 at 12:40:26 (-0600) Robert Naiman writes:
>>I am offering something to the auto industry - the opportunity to make their
>>vehicles more fuel-efficient at zero (production) cost.
>>
>>After all, the auto industry could argue, what really matters is not how
>>many miles the _vehicle_ gets per gallon, but how many miles per gallon it
>>gets _per passenger_...
>>
>>Suppose the car comes (voluntarily) equipped with a little electronic box.
>>Every time you take a trip in the car of more than X miles, you get some
>>kind of economic/pollution control credit if more than one person made the
>>trip. You demonstrate this by everybody in the vehicle swiping their cards
>>in the electronic box, like frequent flyers on an airline. The electronic
>>box has a GPS that counts the miles. Each time the driver and passengers
>>earn credit, the auto manufacturer earns economic/pollution control credit
>>too, giving them an incentive to promote the program...
>
> "Honey, I'm going to the store, gimme your and the kids' cards..."
>
>
> Bill
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
--
Robert Naiman
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
naiman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]