PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Pen-l] In reply to a comrade
- To: PEN-L list <PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Pen-l] In reply to a comrade
- From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:53:02 -0500
- Cc:
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
The day before yesterday I received this email:
---
Hi Louis,
The longer that I am on the Marxism list the more that I find that we
only disagree when it comes to the big organizational question. I see
you defending the proper analysis on so many issues that I felt I had to
take a very close at this organizational issue.
Given the recent developments in Italy, England and France this might be
the foremost issue (for Marxists in/around the FI or non-stalinist
marxists) of our time. Obviously we have a wealth of documentation
detailing the debates in recent times (Callinicos, Sabad, etc), but I am
interested in perspectives from the early 20th century to round this
out. You often refer to Zinoviev as the originator of these views, and I
was wondering if you know of anyone who called him on it in those days,
or debated him? Basically, was there anyone else who put forward a
different viewpoint? Also, how do you feel about the SWP entering and
leaving the SP (I know it was before the SWP was formed) back in the
1930s? Would you criticize that move in the same vein as how you did
with SWP (Britain) in Respect? Also, how do/did you feel about the Black
Panthers, who purported to be a vanguard party as well but seem to have
worked well with other groups better than most sectarian trotskyist
groups of today?
I have read your blog posts on these issues to make sure I didn’t ask
you something you’ve already answered, but if I somehow missed an answer
I apologize. If you only have the time to answer one question I think my
question on Zinoviev is the most important to me. Thanks for your
perspective.
---
Since it would have required a fair amount of time and energy to prepare
a reply and since the questions raised would be of general interest to
Marxists, my correspondent gave me permission to answer him publicly.
full: http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/in-reply-to-a-comrade/
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- [Pen-l] "Has Barack Obamaâs presidency already failed?",
Charles Brown Fri 13 Feb 2009, 01:37 GMT
- [Pen-l] has Karzai changed his name to Diem?,
Jim Devine Thu 12 Feb 2009, 21:13 GMT
- [Pen-l] The Good Old Days, Not So Progressive,
Max Sawicky Thu 12 Feb 2009, 20:00 GMT
- [Pen-l] In reply to a comrade,
Louis Proyect Thu 12 Feb 2009, 19:25 GMT
- [Pen-l] What Congress forgot to ask the bankers,
Michael Perelman Thu 12 Feb 2009, 19:14 GMT
- [Pen-l] the next war?,
Jim Devine Thu 12 Feb 2009, 18:55 GMT
- [Pen-l] the stimulus package...,
Jim Devine Thu 12 Feb 2009, 18:30 GMT
- [Pen-l] pen-pals aren't always in the minority!,
Jim Devine Thu 12 Feb 2009, 17:49 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]