PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Pen-l] CBO on HR 1
- To: Lbo Talk Lbo Talk <lbo-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1
- From: Julio Huato <juliohuato@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:54:50 -0500
- Cc:
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UB30aFLClmx0JPg7SVQ5Oys9Tv7jWvu4Zlgjg1qpx7Y=; b=rVqlVH5eWJdq6qtMg86YIETZ5luY+T9acAcktkoj09uORsPJwCl19FKa0eyJkB/cLh +Tvo/9iTpvUCSM7PgP7T+nwOSK8Csf8n9dvfIWBunNitI6O3qcRruZB1XFvU5lkjdqwZ eSi+q6iM1RdvdbFqqewMEyZH96sJ3F8Ss3pWI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=w6JwwfjQgMJqKMJ9o2Tr6g7LRarREeBcIYQsi4AQSL6pS14jMfhyTjTg/EQp/AvQS6 Ej7B1zsiA2Gi60XFSW45pdfUN6Zi6mbmOGdFGZbsXTeGugw1PamV1eC9SHv+ImFOjD8B WFryL+ckfAGrN31NOM9178qiSEsHmZTsAsqJ4=
SA wrote:
> So the central estimate is that the bill will increase employment by
> 1.6 million by the end of 2009. That's 1% of the labor force. It is not
> a bad bet, then, that unemployment will reach double digits despite
> the stimulus. If it does, how the hell will Obama &co. prevent the
> whole idea of stimulus from being discredited politically?
I have no idea what Obama plans, but this is a political process. I
understand the urgency of these measures. Timing is essential. But I
don't think Obama has only one shot at this. Setbacks can be turned
into victories.
Same with the TARP money left over by Paulson -- and I believe that's
what the "Geithner Plan" so far amounts to; it's not a
once-and-for-all statement of how they will deal with the banks.
As blissfully ignorant as I am of the concrete legislative process in
the U.S., I am sure that Obama and his people will have more
opportunities to advance, should they want to -- and/or be forced to
-- advance.
IMHO, the main role of the left here is not to stay at arms' length
from this political process, waging our index fingers, predicting
disaster, etc. but to reassure working people of the righteousness of
their needs and interest, to persuade them that more drastic measures
are necessary and must be demanded from the government, and to help
them engage in said political process.
In case this needs to be said, this does not mean playing the role of
Obama's cheerleaders. But neither does it mean viewing him as the
main obstacle here.
Maybe my perception is all twisted, but I don't see people disengaged
and apathetic. There's a lot of resentment against banks, Wall
Street, social parasitism, politicians. Energy that can be channeled
politically. And frankly I fail to see yet Obama as taking the role
of defuser of the popular rage, let alone its suppressor.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- [Pen-l] What Congress forgot to ask the bankers,
Michael Perelman Thu 12 Feb 2009, 19:14 GMT
- [Pen-l] the next war?,
Jim Devine Thu 12 Feb 2009, 18:55 GMT
- [Pen-l] the stimulus package...,
Jim Devine Thu 12 Feb 2009, 18:30 GMT
- [Pen-l] pen-pals aren't always in the minority!,
Jim Devine Thu 12 Feb 2009, 17:49 GMT
- [Pen-l] CBO on HR 1,
Julio Huato Thu 12 Feb 2009, 17:27 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]