| Let me back up a bit because this is important on dealing with global warming. Assume for my argument that the studies that say that despite the carbon tax, US GDP, i.e. income will rise relentlessly in the future. (Unfortunately most people, including many on this list, see that as an unquestioned good thing.) I'm not saying the carbon tax raises income but that income rises despite it. So then we;ll use more energy. Joseph Green has been making interesting points against Cap & Trade and the carbon tax but I think an even worse thing to say about them is that they are business as usual with clean energy. That will be terrible. Gene Coyle On Feb 10, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Jim Devine wrote:
|
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Re: [Pen-l] response to global warming. was European carbon market crashing, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] response to global warming. was European carbon market crashing, Sandwichman Tue 10 Feb 2009, 17:21 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] response to global warming. was European carbon market crashing, Jim Devine Tue 10 Feb 2009, 18:47 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] response to global warming. was European carbon market crashing, Eugene Coyle Tue 10 Feb 2009, 19:27 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] response to global warming. was European carbon market crashing, Jim Devine Tue 10 Feb 2009, 20:42 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] response to global warming. was European carbon market crashing, Eugene Coyle Tue 10 Feb 2009, 20:59 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] response to global warming. was European carbon market crashing, Jim Devine Tue 10 Feb 2009, 21:36 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] response to global warming. was European carbon market crashing, Sandwichman Wed 11 Feb 2009, 06:23 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] response to global warming. was European carbon market crashing, Jim Devine Wed 11 Feb 2009, 22:43 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] response to global warming. was European carbon market crashing, Sandwichman Wed 11 Feb 2009, 23:11 GMT