|
DH wrote: Summers had been arguing against big tax cuts and for infrastructure/ green jobs, on the grounds that the last thing the U.S. economy needs is to sustain overconsumption - instead, what we need is higher investment and new dynamic sectors to generate long-term growth. The Reps don't like that at all. JG writes: Thanks for the info. I'm a little embarrassed to admit that I didn't realize that Summers was plumping (ha!) for this. Porky sure has come a long way, eh? I know what they say about the times shaping the man and all that, but still... OTOH, this sounds a lot like Clinton 1993 to me, so I suppose it should not come as a big surprise. O'Connor called it "supply-side social democracy" (the "social democracy" tag seems way too generous to me though!). Justify public expenditure in terms of its positive contribution to increasing productivity. Education spending = "human capital" enhancement. Wetlands protection = "natural capital" enhancement. It's the semiotic trimuph of capitalist values. And with productivity increases gainsaid there's a strong emphasis on public expenditure being self-financing and deficit neutral (at worst). This is not the sort of program that involves a big increase in federal bureaucracy, regulation, or taxes. There's a potential huge role for private contractors. Why are the Repubs so dead-set against it? Knee-jerk Grover Norquistism? Political differentiation for differentiation's sake (and playing to the yahoo base)? Their favored lobby shops and contractors are cut out of the loop because they don't control congressional committees? All of the above? The schism does remind me of the Clinton years. The "national greatness"/ "big gov" Repubs who allegedly flourished during the post-911 segment of Bush's first term (their significance always overstated) have completely vanished. It's almost like the distillation of essences. Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. Check it out. |
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Re: [Pen-l] Democrats to placate Republicans on recovery plan, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] Democrats to placate Republicans on recovery plan, Doug Henwood Wed 04 Feb 2009, 17:29 GMT
- [Pen-l] Democrats to placate Republicans on recovery plan, John Gulick Wed 04 Feb 2009, 17:38 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Democrats to placate Republicans on recovery plan, Max Sawicky Wed 04 Feb 2009, 17:57 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Democrats to placate Republicans on recovery plan, Shane Mage Wed 04 Feb 2009, 20:42 GMT
- [Pen-l] Democrats to placate Republicans on recovery plan, John Gulick Wed 04 Feb 2009, 18:08 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Democrats to placate Republicans on recovery plan, Jim Devine Wed 04 Feb 2009, 19:02 GMT
- [Pen-l] shame video, Dan Scanlan Wed 04 Feb 2009, 02:39 GMT
- [Pen-l] The Sustainable Development Paradox - Parts 1 & 2, Luis Gutierrez Wed 04 Feb 2009, 02:32 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The Sustainable Development Paradox - Parts 1 & 2, Carl Dassbach Wed 04 Feb 2009, 02:53 GMT