On Jan 31, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Jim Devine wrote:
I don't quite agree. Marx, I believe, used the term Critique (Kritik) in an entirely *Kantian* sense, going through the contradictions of political economy to clarify the rational kernel of its fundamental presuppositions as Kant did in his three critiques (of Judgment, Practical Reason, and Pure Reason). Just as Hegel erected the "Philosophical Sciences" on the underlying basis of the Kantian critiques, so Marx undertook the (never-to-be-completed) construction of a new Economic Science on the basis of his accomplished critique. Shane Mage This cosmos did none of gods or men make, but it always was and is and shall be: an everlasting fire, kindling in measures and going out in measures." Herakleitos of Ephesos |
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Re: [Pen-l] Fictitious Value vs. Marxian value, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] Fictitious Value vs. Marxian value, Jim Devine Sat 31 Jan 2009, 14:55 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Fictitious Value vs. Marxian value, Michael Perelman Sat 31 Jan 2009, 16:36 GMT
- [Pen-l] Moishe Postone, Carrol Cox Sat 31 Jan 2009, 16:52 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Moishe Postone, Jim Devine Sat 31 Jan 2009, 17:15 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Moishe Postone, Shane Mage Sat 31 Jan 2009, 19:43 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Moishe Postone, Jim Devine Sat 31 Jan 2009, 20:01 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Moishe Postone, Sandwichman Sat 31 Jan 2009, 17:51 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Moishe Postone, Carrol Cox Sat 31 Jan 2009, 19:23 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Fictitious Value vs. Marxian value, Jim Devine Sat 31 Jan 2009, 16:59 GMT