Re: [Pen-l] Skidelsky on Schumpeterian & "real" business cycles

To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Skidelsky on Schumpeterian & "real" business cycles
From: Jim Devine <jdevine03@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 08:40:06 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EQiDJqCWRfXWZ5PSCYCIiGtACrHM5VFOygTfaYFXDp0=; b=MAnBFqeErGCQxJzFOJE/o1yJcnFb93jnGFBaHb2PLebg2s1CY0YtoOXT4rTYqlJTIh FeZkglbGq2JuBmY44sYFuLvpl4t3BHEnb62Op3W+q23bdEOujHMB52b08d++UwQhv68f DO7OJfGEKK1HNpdBHs6ZWN7gUR2OKEKsAP3hE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uWR57/T79fzpI2ftWxCT9Dk3p+wXEabCah5SmmWDEwJKjZ28yWEfT+YwXxzb9bI3Wv /m6iOXVPX4ZNaqjfn6b0isVx65GGp/3uEWRg2i5huC/Z/9H6d/rfPis2j8KkvAa9io8x Pe1Mn7lTh25GGoNfiwcMuJ8bZt88L42KZcCSA=

Michael Perelman wrote:
> The modern-day fans of Schumpeter don't really understand Schumpeter.
> Right after he talks about creative destruction, he goes on to explain
> how capitalist markets need controls to keep from careening into chaos...

also, why isn't it "destructive creation"?
-- 
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Pen-l] Skidelsky on Schumpeterian & "real" business cycles
  - From: michael perelman

References:
- [Pen-l] Skidelsky on Schumpeterian & "real" business cycles
  - From: Jim Devine
- RE: [Pen-l] Skidelsky on Schumpeterian & "real" business cycles
  - From: Perelman, Michael

Prev by Date: Re: [Pen-l] New Beginnings in Pakistan aka Bush II
Next by Date: Re: [Pen-l] Short Synthesis of the recent pen'l nationalization debate
Previous by thread: RE: [Pen-l] Skidelsky on Schumpeterian & "real" business cycles
Next by thread: Re: [Pen-l] Skidelsky on Schumpeterian & "real" business cycles
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Obama and the Cult of Personality (class alignment) 2, Waistline2 Sat 24 Jan 2009, 10:07 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] Obama and the Cult of Personality (class alignment), Waistline2 Sat 24 Jan 2009, 08:29 GMT
- [Pen-l] Skidelsky on Schumpeterian & "real" business cycles, Jim Devine Fri 23 Jan 2009, 23:20 GMT
  - RE: [Pen-l] Skidelsky on Schumpeterian & "real" business cycles, Perelman, Michael Sat 24 Jan 2009, 04:41 GMT
    - Re: [Pen-l] Skidelsky on Schumpeterian & "real" business cycles, Jim Devine Sat 24 Jan 2009, 16:13 GMT
      
      Re: [Pen-l] Skidelsky on Schumpeterian & "real" business cycles, michael perelman Sat 24 Jan 2009, 16:36 GMT
      
      Re: [Pen-l] Skidelsky on Schumpeterian & "real" business cycles, Jim Devine Sat 24 Jan 2009, 17:05 GMT
      
      Re: [Pen-l] Skidelsky on Schumpeterian & "real" business cycles, Michael Perelman Sat 24 Jan 2009, 17:15 GMT
- [Pen-l] critique of "growth" [was: Mankiw's critique of Obama's proposed fiscal policy.], Jim Devine Fri 23 Jan 2009, 21:27 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]