PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] The economics professions
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 15:39 -0800, David B. Shemano wrote:
> Laurent Guerby writes:
>
> >> Why do you think economists are devoted to understanding our economy?
> >>
> >> If they're rational and smart they know that economics has no
> >> predictive power whatsoever so they will instead sell their current
> >> influence on politicians to interest groups who pay the highest price.
>
> Why do you think individuals go into academia and spend their time on
> a topic creating models, teaching undergraduates, writing articles?
Academia is not uniform. I'm arguing that economists in academia have
different incentives than physicists because economy and physics don't
have *at all* the same status in society.
Not much different from what I stated here is some analysis by Dean
Baker:
http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein_archive?month=12&year=2008&base_name=apply_economics_to_economists
> I have the feeling that you (and others on this list) are buying into
> the notion that people who advocate ideas they agree with have good
> motivations and people who advocate ideas they disagree with have bad
> motivations. I believe such assumptions are a fallacy.
Ad hominen.
> >> Overall government official incentives are less skewed than economists
> >> incentives, so more of them will have some care for the general
> >> interest.
>
> I truly believe there is no theoretical or empirical support for your
> statement and it is entirely counterintuitive. If the goal is truth
> or even the "general interest", why would an academic, protected by
> academic freedom with no pecuniary or other interest in the outcome of
> a prediction, have worse incentives than a government official, who is
> subject to the multitude of competing political interests?
"no pecuniary or other interest" for an economist? Are you really
thinking what you wrote?
I'm curious about an experiment: try to invite for a talk in your
average edu institution a top economist and a top physicist and compare
conditions.
Laurent
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] The economics professions, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] The economics professions,
Laurent GUERBY Wed 14 Jan 2009, 11:02 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The economics professions,
Ted Winslow Wed 14 Jan 2009, 13:57 GMT
- [Pen-l] The economics professions,
Charles Brown Wed 14 Jan 2009, 15:47 GMT
- RE: Re: [Pen-l] The economics professions,
David B. Shemano Wed 14 Jan 2009, 23:11 GMT
- RE: [Pen-l] The economics professions,
David B. Shemano Thu 15 Jan 2009, 01:25 GMT
- re:Re: [Pen-l] The economics professions,
Gassler Robert Thu 15 Jan 2009, 10:02 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]