PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] Dean Baker: Getting the most bang for the stimulus buck
- To: Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Dean Baker: Getting the most bang for the stimulus buck
- From: Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:40:45 -0600
Sandwichman wrote:
>
> Admittedly, implementation and enforcement would be a challenge for
> this proposal. In that respect, it doesn't differ from existing labor
> standards legislation in principle -- only in magnitude. Another way
> to skin this cat would be with something akin to an EITC, which could
> be called an Earned Leisure Tax Credit. There you would introduce a
> kind of cross-check of employees filing for the credit and employers
> providing the data in the form of payroll receipts.
Have working hours ever been reeduced significantly in the absence of
mass struggle by workers? I mean men and women died in the struggle for
the 8-hour day. It wasn't adopted as a normal policy decision through
normal channels.
Carrol
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Dean Baker: Getting the most bang for the stimulus buck, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]