PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Pen-l] The economics professions
While I am writing, to those of you complaining about the bankruptcy of the economics professions for failing to forsee the events of 2008, what conclusion are you drawing? The conclusion that I draw is that if thousands of very smart people devoted to understanding our economy couldn't accurately predict what was going to occur, why do we think a few dozen government officials could do any better?
David Shemano
^^^
CB: This reminds of what Einstein said when hundreds wrote criticizing something he had said. He said if he was wrong, it would only have taken one to show it.
Anyway, lots of economists on PEN-L predicted that the neo-liberal structures would lead to a crisis, no ?
This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. www.surfcontrol.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] The economics professions, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] The economics professions,
raghu Tue 13 Jan 2009, 22:50 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The economics professions,
Laurent GUERBY Wed 14 Jan 2009, 11:02 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] The economics professions,
Ted Winslow Wed 14 Jan 2009, 13:57 GMT
- [Pen-l] The economics professions,
Charles Brown Wed 14 Jan 2009, 15:47 GMT
- RE: Re: [Pen-l] The economics professions,
David B. Shemano Wed 14 Jan 2009, 23:11 GMT
- RE: [Pen-l] The economics professions,
David B. Shemano Thu 15 Jan 2009, 01:25 GMT
- re:Re: [Pen-l] The economics professions,
Gassler Robert Thu 15 Jan 2009, 10:02 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]