On Jan 13, 2009, at 7:10 PM, raghu wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Michael Smith <mjs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Appointing anti-progressives like Larry Summers. Temporizing and/or sending mixed signals about issues like Palestine, Guantanamo etc.
Has anybody considered that perhaps these represent neither failure nor caution, but *purpose*?
That is a very cynical viewpoint and while it may be fashionable among the left, I don't believe it is objectively justified by what we know so far.
Doug _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Re: [Pen-l] William Kristol: Obama will be calling Cheney for advice, (continued)
- Re: [Pen-l] William Kristol: Obama will be calling Cheney for advice, Carl Dassbach Tue 13 Jan 2009, 23:31 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] William Kristol: Obama will be calling Cheney for advice, Michael Smith Wed 14 Jan 2009, 00:33 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] William Kristol: Obama will be calling Cheney for advice, Carrol Cox Wed 14 Jan 2009, 03:41 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] William Kristol: Obama will be calling Cheney for advice, raghu Tue 13 Jan 2009, 23:44 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] William Kristol: Obama will be calling Cheney for advice, Doug Henwood Wed 14 Jan 2009, 01:21 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] William Kristol: Obama will be calling Cheney for advice, raghu Wed 14 Jan 2009, 02:28 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] William Kristol: Obama will be calling Cheney for advice, Michael Smith Wed 14 Jan 2009, 02:40 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] William Kristol: Obama will be calling Cheney for advice, raghu Wed 14 Jan 2009, 03:23 GMT
- Re: [Pen-l] William Kristol: Obama will be calling Cheney for advice, Michael Smith Wed 14 Jan 2009, 03:35 GMT