PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Pen-l] auto bailout question
- To: dassbach@xxxxxxx, Progressive Economics <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Pen-l] auto bailout question
- From: ravi <ravi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:10:44 -0500
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=platosbeard.org; h=Received:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer:X-Identified-User; b=BvqvWcC/PcEuVl14rSo7AaGjGXyu9vxDgU01DaF9NBiv1un1h+kjy1E+mnu2GMKHVmDBexTLfAjDHDDj9ckkK+Uuw7XXGppMad0N2UmslK+D1/PmgJieOGnKTebpbPw9;
On Dec 13, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Carl Dassbach wrote:
Kindly explain.... if it "passed" with 52 votes.
See my post. I believe this was a cloture vote or equivalent, that
attempted to forego debate and move the bill to direct vote. That has
to pass by 60 votes. So 52 votes is a majority but not enough to pass.
--ravi
--
Support something better than yourself ;-)
PeTA => http://peta.org/
Greenpeace => http://greenpeace.org/
If you have nothing better to read: http://platosbeard.org/
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]