PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Pen-l] Why is "Nationalization" A Dirty Word in America?
Why is "Nationalization" A Dirty Word in America?
From: "Mark Laffey"
Well, the short answer would be that nationalisation can be articulated to notions of the nation as well as to a notion of the workers. Those are very different - crudely, one leads to fascism, the other leads to communism.
Mark
^^^^
CB: True. So:
Socialism implies ( in the logical sense of modus ponens) nationalization
Not nationalization ,not socialism.
Nationalization is a necessary condition of socialism. socialism is a sufficient condition of nationalization.
However, Nationalization does not (necessarily) imply socialism.
Socialism is not a necessary condition of nationalization. And nationalization is not a sufficient condition of socialism.
This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. www.surfcontrol.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
- Thread context:
- Re: [Pen-l] Why is "Nationalization" A Dirty Word in America?, (continued)
- [Pen-l] a feminist angle,
Jim Devine Tue 09 Dec 2008, 15:27 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]